The VIP Primer
VIP: Vacuum Infusion Process
Author: Andre Cocquyt, President of GRPguru.com
VIP is an acronym to describe a technology for closed molding of fiberglass reinforced plastics. The VIP concept is: to use vacuum pressure for pushing liquid resin into dry reinforcements that have been laid in a sealed mold. This mold can be a one sided hard shell with a vacuum bag, a two sided hard shell with a vacuum seal or and all around soft bag.
Any process that uses a lower-than-atmospheric pressure to drive resin into the mold cavity is VIP (Vacuum Infusion Molding).
Any system that uses higher-than-atmospheric pressure to drive the resin is RTM (Resin Transfer Molding).
Several acronyms describe the different methods to deliver and distribute the resin. A common goal of all systems is to get the resin to its final destination in the fastest and easiest way possible.
Fortunately, there's no magic involved in making this happen. VIP obeys Darcy's law, formulated by Henri D'Arcy, a French civil engineer, in 1856 while researching water flow through soil.
The filling time for a VIP part is determined by four elements:
- Viscosity of the resin,
- Porosity/permeability of the reinforcement,
- Applied pressure difference
- Flow distance
Let's look at these elements in more detail.
Viscosity
Within one Bar or 14.7 psi as maximum working pressure of vacuum infusion, the practical higher limit for the resin viscosity is around 400 cps. Most large resin suppliers have infusion resins with a viscosity around 250 cps for ortho and iso polyesters, below 200 cps for vinylesters. Low viscosity blends, including DCPD can also offer a very cost-effective solution with good mechanical properties and fatigue resistance. Epoxy resins, when formulated for low viscosity and sufficient exotherm control, can also be used. Very low viscosity can be achieved by heating up resins prior to mixing. Besides the low viscosity, the Thixotropic index of the resin is also important.
Porosity/Permeability
It is important that the resin can travel through the laminate at an even speed, i.e. meets the same level of porosity and permeability to keep the resin front even. There are two aspects to this: the void space between the fibers has to be big enough to let the resin flow through, and the size of the void has to be even. Straight fibers such as stitched fibers have better flow characteristics than woven rovings, which crimp at every fiber intersection. Random dispersed fibers such as continuous strand mat, provide a great deal of permeability, even after compression, and can aid the resin flow. Non-woven bulk materials and continuous strand mat are also facilitating flow through the laminate.
Pressure Difference
A full vacuum equals one atmosphere or 14.7 PSI. This is the maximum pressure difference that we can use in VIP, but it is sufficient to infuse even large structures in a short time, provided that we do not have too much vertical rise. The pressure gradually decreases as the height of the vertical infusion track increases. Full vacuum is a key ingredient in VIP. First, to achieve maximum infusion pressure. But also because the air that remains in the laminate when you apply only a partial vacuum poses risks for dry spots and inclusions.
Flow Distance
One of the biggest issues in resin infusion is the modeling of the distance that the resin has to travel between infusion point and delivery point. When the resin travels through the vacuum-compressed fiber reinforcement, the cumulative resistance
will gradually slow it down. Shortening the travel distance
can be done by multiplying the infusion points, creating feed
channel grids, adding a feeding layer, or any combination
there off. The beauty of feeding layer delivery systems is
that the resin can travel fast in the feeding layer over the
entire laminate and migrate into the reinforcement from there,
a distance of a mere few millimeters in most cases.
Resin Front
A fair part of the training for shopfloor crews
is spent on feeder and vacuum line design and layout. They
are the primary means to control the resin flow and fill rate.
Size of the lines, distance, and breaks are different for
every part. There is no "how to" handbook, and a lot rides
on the experience of the crew, as well as on keeping good
records, and extensive testing of complicated sections. In
general terms, when the pressure in the vacuum cavity is even,
and the reinforcements have an even porosity/permeability,
a resin front will flow very evenly. Several software packages
are available to model resin flow, but for the average boat
building application it is sufficient in most cases to simulate
the flow on a partial lay-up to predict flow pattern and fill
time.
Current Infusion Methods
The three basic methods for resin delivery are:
- Surface Medium
- Core Channels
- Interlaminar Medium
Surface Medium Systems
This technique allows very fast distribution
of large quantities of resin, and provides good control over
the flow front. Surface medium systems are very adaptable
and can effectively be used for one-off or small series construction.
The size and direction of the feeder lines can be adapted
to a part or an area, and the medium can be selectively placed
to control the resin front. Surface medium systems can be disposable, placed underneath
a vacuum bag, or can have a reusable bag with the distribution
medium and channels incorporated. The drawbacks of any disposable
medium method are the amount of waste it generates and the
manual placement of the medium for each part. The manual placement
is eliminated by the reusable bag systems, but reusable bags
are expensive and their handling requires a thorough knowledge
of the process. The best known surface medium system is SCRIMPÔ,
which uses a knitted shade cloth as a distribution medium,
with a grid of permeable feeder and vacuum lines connected
to it.
Core Channels
Core
channels or grooves are a simple, straightforward way to distribute
resin in cored laminates. They can either be precut by the
manufacturer, or be made on site. Number of channels, size
and depth of the cuts and layout of larger feeder grooves
are made according to part size and reinforcements. Core channel
infusion is most effective on flat surfaces, and a very effective,
waste-free way to infuse parts where the cosmetics are not
critical. Because the channels are full of resin, they will
shrink more than the surrounding foam and show a very defined
print pattern. The resin in the core channels will add some
weight to the part, but this can offset the cost of disposable
supplies with other systems.
Recent
developments in core channel technology make it possible to
reduce the print issue to a minimum and limit the weight addition
that the channels create.
Interlaminar Medium
Interlaminar
media originate in RTM, but are getting more use in VIP applications.
They provide a flow path by incorporating a highly porous
layer in the laminate, such as a continuous roving material
or a non-woven breeder-like material. As the interlaminar feed layer is resin rich, the total
fiber/resin ratio gains with this method are limited. But
by spacing the high fiber volume layers to the outside of
the laminates, the medium helps to increase the thickness
and consequently the stiffness. A new development are laminates
with a porous core composed of multi-axis fibers that act
as spacers but have enough fibers in the Z-direction to absorb
and transmit stresses. Recently, new weave styles with flow
channels incorporated have been introduced and show great
promise.
Getting Started with VIP
What
does it take to get into infusion? The equipment list to get
started is rather short: a good vacuum pump (has to deliver
sufficient cfm. at pressures over 27 Hg), an acoustic listening
device, a thermometer, a few resin collectors, clamps, hoses,
vacuum gauges and the usual vacuum bagging supplies. For a
small test set up, the equipment budget will be less than
a thousand dollars. The major cost for larger shops is a good
fail-safe vacuum system with twin pumps, filter, reservoir
and permanent vacuum lines throughout the shop.
The
biggest cost associated with VIP conversion is the mold modifications
and the overhaul of the plant lay-out to adapt it to the VIP
process.
To
learn the technology of VIP, one can go different ways: spend
money on licenses and training or go experimenting in a corner
of the shop. While the experimenting part may be very appealing
to the individualistic nature of the fiberglass technician,
it doesn't take long to spend a few thousand dollars on materials
and labor, hoping to solve all the intricate details that
make the difference between science and black magic in VIP.
While VIP relies on the four principles of d'Arcy's law, it
also requires a lot of attention to detail and an intricate
knowledge of the process (which I usually define as the fifty-one
tricks of infusion). Economically, it makes more sense to
bite the bullet and call in an experienced "vipper". A VIP
base-course is one week, but it takes two to four weeks to
train the average fiberglass worker to a point where he has
production-ready skills. Count on a training budget of $5 to
$7,000. Depending on the chosen system, the technology can
be open or may require licensing. A review of the most relevant
patents is attached to this summary.
To VIP…
The
bigger the size of the product, the more sense it makes to
VIP: there is no other system available to apply the kind
of mechanical pressure on big molds that can be achieved by
using the 14.7 PSI delivered by the air pressure difference.
Furthermore,
as laminates get thicker and more complicated, secondary bonding
becomes more of an issue during large part construction. There's
no secondary bonding in VIP. There are no voids in VIP laminates.
Laminates are pre-compacted, then saturated with resin. All
reinforcements are placed dry, can be aligned and adjusted
without the worry of running out of time. There are no multiple
bagging sessions, no core putties. VIP eliminates the manual
application of large quantities of resin, and having to deal
with large, wet and slippery surfaces. There are no massive
styrene emissions during the large lay ups. There is no need
for the workers to suit up as for a venture in outer space.
No sticky floors, rollers, gloves or cleaning solvents. Net
resin savings are usually in the order of 30 to 40%.
Stringers,
inserts, backing plates and other structural reinforcements
etc. can be co-infused. Net shaping and use of peel ply can
avoid grinding and post-lamination sanding.
And
the hours? Placement of dry fibers is faster and the time
of wetting and rolling out is eliminated.
Installation
of the medium and the bag takes back most of those hours.
Overall, the hourly gain is usually less than 20%, but can
be more if the conversion to VIP is used as an opportunity
to overhaul the complete production system. When re-usable
bags or hard counter molds are part of the set-up, the gains
can be more significant, but the investment is a lot higher.
Infusion times are short, even for large parts: a 50-ft boat
hull will typically take around 2 hours. Small parts can be
infused in less than ten minutes.
… or not to VIP
VIP
may be the system of the future but it is a technology "under
development". Thermosetting resin shrink during curing, and
that is not about to change, it is part of the process of
crosslinking. In a wet lay up this is a gradual process: every
layer shrinks towards the mold surface. In VIP, all layers
get wetted out and start shrinking at the same time, generating
higher temperatures during curing, as all the resin in the
part co-cures. In a VIP part, the complete cure cycle is completed
almost instantly, contrary to traditional hand lay up where
post curing and shrinkage extends over weeks, even months.
This helps greatly to improve mechanical properties of the
VIP part, but it also displays the final cosmetics right away.
VIP Cosmetics
VIP parts have acquired the reputation of being a technician's
dream and a beautician's nightmare. How good or how bad is
it really?
VIP
can be used for most gelcoated parts. The final surface distortion
will not be much different from a hand laid part that has
aged for a few months. Improving cosmetics is a field where
a lot of the development will be focused in the next years.
Most major resin suppliers are working on resins with lesser
exothermal peeks and reduced shrinkage. But to achieve a high
gloss, no-print gelcoat is not yet possible with VIP.
The EPA, MACT and HAP's: What's What
The
most complete information on the new MACT legislation can
be obtained from the CFA-HQ.org website and from the NMMA
info services. Boatbuilders are treated as a separate category
in the new legislation. Bottom line is however that open molding
as we know it will be pretty much obsolete by 2005.
INFUSION PATENTS
This
is a partial list of significant infusion technology patents.
Before starting to use any VIP technology, it is important
to verify if the method is open, generic, or protected by
a patent and subject to licensing agreements, in order to
avoid patent infringement.
For more detailed patent info, cross-referencing or further research, go to: www.patents.ibm.com, or to www.getthepatent.com or to www.uspo.gov. Info on patent law can be found at the www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/35/
Significant Resin Infusion Patents
| Muskat |
1950 |
2,495,640 |
Marco Method |
| Smith |
1959 |
2,913,036 |
Process and apparatus for molding large plastic structures |
| Geringer |
1964 |
3,137,898 |
RTM |
| Muskat |
1967 |
3,342,787 |
RTM |
| Group
Lotus |
1972 |
(GB)
1,432,333 |
Vacuum
molding patent |
| Johnson |
1979 |
4,132,755 |
Process for manufacturing resin-impregnated, reinforced articles without the presence of resin fumes |
| Rolston |
1980 |
4,238,437 |
Method
for producing fiber reinforced product |
| Fourcher |
1982 |
4,312,829 |
Molding
method |
| Palmer |
1982 |
4,311,661 |
Resin
impregnation process |
| Lecomte |
1982 |
4,359,437 |
Method and apparatus for producing a thin-walled article of synthetic resin, in particular a large-sized article |
| Letterman |
1986 |
4,622,091 |
Resin
film infusion process and apparatus |
| Krauter |
1988 |
4,759,893 |
Method
of making FRP molded parts |
| Epel |
1989 |
4,873044 |
Method and apparatus for reduction of mold cycle time |
| McGowen |
1989 |
4,886,442 |
Vacuum
bag tooling app. with inflatable seal |
| Seemann |
1990 |
4,902,215 |
Plastic
transfer molding techniques for the production of
fiber reinforced plastic structures |
| Palmer |
1990 |
4,942,013 |
Vacuum
resin impregnation process |
| Lindgren |
1990 |
4,975,311 |
Vacuum
lamination station |
| Bailey |
1995 |
5,588,392 |
Resin
Transfer molding process (for boat hulls) |
| Seemann |
1995 |
5,439,635 |
Unitary
vacuum bag for forming fiber reinforced composite
articles and process for making same |
| McGuiness |
1996 |
5,526,767 |
Method
of manufacturing a boat hull |
SCRIMP Patents
| Patents |
Title |
Inventor(s) |
Issue Date |
| 4,902,215
(US) |
Plastic
Transfer Molding Techniques For The Production Of Fiber
Reinforced Plastic Structures |
W.
Seemann, III |
02/20/90 |
| 5,052,906
(US) |
Plastic
Transfer Molding Techniques For The Production Of Fiber
Reinforced Plastic Structures |
W.
Seemann |
10/01/91 |
| 5,316,462
(US) |
Unitary
Vacuum Bag For Forming Fiber Reinforced Composite Articles |
W.
Seemann |
05/31/94 |
| 5,439,635
(US) |
Unitary
Vacuum Bag For Forming Fiber Reinforced Composite Articles
And Process For Making The Same |
W.
Seemann |
08/08/95 |
| 5,601,852
(US) |
Unitary
Vacuum Bag For Forming Fiber Reinforced Composite Articles
And Process For Making The Same |
W.
Seemann |
02/11/97 |
| 5,702,663
(US) |
Vacuum
Bag for Forming Fiber Reinforced Composite Articles And
Method For Using Same |
W.
Seemann |
12/30/97 |
| 5,721,034
(US) |
Large
Composite Structures Incorporating A Resin Distribution
Network |
W.
Seemann, III
G. Tunis, III
A. Perrella,
R. Haraldsson
W. Everitt
E. Pearson |
02/24/98 |
| 5,904,972
(US) |
Large
Composite Core Structures Formed By Vacuum Assisted Resin
Transfer Molding |
G.
Tunis
S. Winckler |
05/18/99 |
| 5,958,325
(US) |
Large
Composite Structures And A Method For Production Of Large
Composite Structures |
W.
Seemann
E. Pearson
W. Everitt
R. Haraldsson
A. Perella
G. Tunis |
09/28/99 |
|